Betta Fish Care  
Go Back   Betta Fish and Betta Fish Care > The Lounge
Check out the eBook Betta Fish Care Made Easy
betta fish
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-29-2012, 12:50 PM   #31 
PolarBearDog
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: abilene
Ah, see in those cases I believe I can agree. I will admit when some one is more well informed than I. As I said I'm gonna lean towards the option that has the greatest potential for the most life.

A lot of the other arguments I hear are about pregnancies being difficult in some way shape or form, usually with death as a possibility due to the rare accidents. Or arguments about problems with the baby's health after birth. such was the case with my niece, she was born 3 months premature. Doctors didn't think she would live past the night. or the day. or the next. or the week.....She is now a perfectly healthy 9 year old.
So, I don't really buy into those arguments, besides that just goes into the whole what is life thing again.

And Freyja, for what you brought up- I think a big thing is that women don't choose to get pregnant all the time, there are "accidents" and worse there is rape. As for opinion, yea thats true to an extent. Things get muddied up when the issue of protecting life gets involved. And AGAIN it all boils down to when is the fetus considered alive, just as terror said earlier; because it is ok to impose your opinion on others to protect people from being victimized from others. EX. stopping a mugging/murder/rape. extreme examples but you see my point, I hope. the problems arise in issues like abortion where the line is murky and not agreed upon. and so some people are civil and some go all west bro baptist.....
PolarBearDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 04:54 PM   #32 
homegrown terror
Member
 
homegrown terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Tennessee
here's another facet of the discussion that admittedly is rarely a concern but still interesting to me: what is the general pro-life stance on separating a parasitic conjoined twin? if it's undeveloped (sometimes they present as just a circulatory system with a partially developed central nervous system, or just a vestigial head etc) is it considered a "life" that should be preserved, even at potential risk to the viable child?
homegrown terror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 07:05 PM   #33 
PolarBearDog
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: abilene
seems very interesting. however.....im not well informed enough on that to be able to speak confidently on that. I guess it might matter if there was a brain developed or not.
PolarBearDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 09:41 AM   #34 
Freyja
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Puerto Rico
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolarBearDog View Post
Ah, see in those cases I believe I can agree. I will admit when some one is more well informed than I. As I said I'm gonna lean towards the option that has the greatest potential for the most life.

A lot of the other arguments I hear are about pregnancies being difficult in some way shape or form, usually with death as a possibility due to the rare accidents. Or arguments about problems with the baby's health after birth. such was the case with my niece, she was born 3 months premature. Doctors didn't think she would live past the night. or the day. or the next. or the week.....She is now a perfectly healthy 9 year old.
So, I don't really buy into those arguments, besides that just goes into the whole what is life thing again.

And Freyja, for what you brought up- I think a big thing is that women don't choose to get pregnant all the time, there are "accidents" and worse there is rape. As for opinion, yea thats true to an extent. Things get muddied up when the issue of protecting life gets involved. And AGAIN it all boils down to when is the fetus considered alive, just as terror said earlier; because it is ok to impose your opinion on others to protect people from being victimized from others. EX. stopping a mugging/murder/rape. extreme examples but you see my point, I hope. the problems arise in issues like abortion where the line is murky and not agreed upon. and so some people are civil and some go all west bro baptist.....
I would impose a whole lot more than my opinion on those WBB idiots.
Freyja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 02:44 PM   #35 
SnowySurface
Member
 
SnowySurface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bay Shore, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by homegrown terror View Post
here's another facet of the discussion that admittedly is rarely a concern but still interesting to me: what is the general pro-life stance on separating a parasitic conjoined twin? if it's undeveloped (sometimes they present as just a circulatory system with a partially developed central nervous system, or just a vestigial head etc) is it considered a "life" that should be preserved, even at potential risk to the viable child?
I also don't have much knowledge on that particular example, but I would be surprised if a pro-life person would be against the removal of a parasitic twins. I don't think the parasitic twin would have self awareness that makes it more than a collection of cells being kept active by the developed twin. I wouldn't see anything wrong with giving the fully developed twin a chance at a fuller life. Especially if the parasitic twin is a danger to the fully developed twin's health.

Personally, I'm more interested in the pro-life opinion on reducing a pregnancy. Like, when a woman is pregnant with triplets naturally, but one of the triplets is endangering the other two developing fetuses. I've even heard about instances where twins are reduced to an only child for the sake of not losing the entire pregnancy. There is the option of an emergency pre-mature cesarean, but then you are choosing which child is disabled instead of which child dies. (As someone with disabilities, I say being disabled is better than being dead. ) Either way, you are stuck in a potion where you have to play God to a certain extent. Also, this situation is much more common than parasitic twins so I'm a bit more interested in other opinions about this scenario.

Personally, I wouldn't stop a pregnancy the moment it looks like it will be risky for me to continue. However, I think continuing a multiple birth pregnancy after the GYN suggests reducing is risking the fetuses' chance at life instead of risking my own life. I'll survive whether I abort or continue with all 3 fetuses (in the case of triplets). But the fetuses' are the ones who have to cross their fingers (if they have any yet XD) and hope they don't all die together because I refuse to abort 1 to save the other 2. I would feel like I reduced to save two while continuing would allow all 3 to die due to a moral hang up. I would probably always wonder "what if...", but I wouldn't regret protecting the 2 I could carry to full term.

I would also like to re-enforce the fact that my thoughts are based on naturally occurring multiple births. Large pregnancies that are the result of IVF are a different can of worms I don't feel like opening.
SnowySurface is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I use a human thermometer in his home? zaylia Betta Fish Care 5 09-23-2012 10:40 AM
human needs dog training Shirleythebetta Finless Friends 19 03-14-2012 09:48 AM
The Human Torch anbu Betta Pictures 5 05-14-2011 09:48 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.