Betta Fish Forum banner

Would you euthanize an elderly betta?

3.8K views 7 replies 5 participants last post by  cj47  
#1 · (Edited)
We've had Charlie for about 4 years, assuming he was a year old when he was received, he's at least 5, which I understand is on the old side for a betta. He lives in a 2.5 gal heated, filtered tank with an Anubias and a log to hide in, and the tank is cycled and the water parameters are good. He's had a tumor on his jaw for the last 2 years or so. In the last few months, he's slowed down a lot, sleeping more, eating less, playing less. I think his eyesight has been bad/gone for a bit because we had to really work to get him to find his food. He hasn't shown any signs of being actually sick, he's just slowed down. In the last three weeks or so, he's eaten even less, stopped playing at all, and in the last few days he's not even swimming up to the top of his tank to get a gulp of air like he used to, and he's not been lounging around on his "betta hammock", the plastic leaf stuck to the side of his tank that, next to his log, used to be his favorite hangout. He's started just sleeping on the bottom of his tank or in his plant, moving to a different spot every now and again and spending the night in his log. When he stopped even trying to eat his Betta One pellets, I started feeding him bloodworms and daphnia instead, thinking that perhaps the tumor was growing a bit inside of his mouth,making it hard to eat--but now he won't even respond to those. He still looks at me if I get close to the tank, but he won't respond to any of the "playtime" triggers like he used to.

As much as I hate to face it, I think he's come to the end of his time with us. Today, his red color is really light and while his face has been silvery grey for a long time, it's now more white.

He's been a good little friend, and I don't want him to suffer--if he's not eating, he'll eventually starve, and I hate to think of that. I want to make his end as easy as possible for him. Should I let him go when he's ready, or should I help him along? I have clove essential oil, I've read that it can be used to humanely euthanize a fish. My concern is that removing him from his "home" for the job would stress him, and that's the last thing I want to do.

Is it more humane to let him go naturally, or to help him along? What have you guys done with your older fish? Thanks for your opinions.

:-(

c.
 
#2 ·
This is really a question only you can answer, I think. You know your betta's behaviour and you may know if he is actually suffering.

Personally I think it is not a bad thing to just wait until the organs all give out naturally. He may just go peacefully in his sleep.

If he has lived with his tumor for two years it must be quite a slow growing one, and I would think he is not suffering with it.

If you do think it would be kinder to help him along you could do the test, to see if he if he still swims away when you are trying to catch him. As long as he still fights I think he deserves each day that is still granted to him.

But really, you have been a really good Betta-parent, to have had him with you that long. That truly is special! I think you have the acknowledgement from every one here that you should (and can) have faith in your own decision making!

Sending hugs xx
 
#5 ·
I am someone who chooses euthanasia over letting a fish pass naturally. This is simply because every time I've found a fish close to passing, it has shown visible signs of distress (gasping, severely compromised mobility, seizure like behaviour etc.). Furthermore, I figure for an animal that is likely fairly low down on the food chain, being in such a vulnerable position must be highly stressful.

For me personally, euthanasia is much quicker than letting a fish pass naturally, and if you use something like blunt force trauma (the thought of which many hobbyists cannot stomach), the fish is dead before it even has time to realise it.

So this is the other side of the debate.

Personally, I euthanase a fish once the quality of life becomes poor. This means if the fish is sitting at the bottom of the tank, refusing to eat, and showing a steady decline in condition and health, and I have exhausted any possible explanation for its behaviour (poor water quality, parasites, treatable disease etc.) I will euthanase.

I like to extend the same courtesy to my fish, as I would any other animal in my care.
 
#6 ·
Thanks for another point of view, you make a good argument for easing him out rather than letting him go on his own.

He's still hanging in there, he moves from spot to spot and hangs out for awhile, then moves again. No interest in eating, so I've stopped trying to feed him, but I did vacuum the tank yesterday to remove all the uneaten food from the past few days. If he shows any signs of having trouble breathing or stress, I'll euthanize him. He's had a happy life, and I don't want him to suffer.

Thanks, everyone, for your opinions and information.

c.
 
#7 ·
Have you tried treating him with 100% unscented epsom salt he might just be constipated. I found that epsom salt was helpful to a fish I had that had a tumor it helped keep him regular and reduced swelling. I also lowered his water level to make it easier to surface. That did help him to have a rebound. I really only saw real discomfort on his last day or two. I've euthanized a couple of fish before and have decided I would rather them pass naturally.
 
#8 ·
Well, this wasn't a sudden onset type of thing, he didn't look bloated and it wasn't like he was looking ill, he just started slowing down. I did lower his water as much as possible, given that he does a filter in there.
He's still hanging in there, but it's looking like he's starting to experience some discomfort. Before, he'd spend all his time in his plant or log, but he'd move around. He's starting to really just sit at the bottom and watch us, but not engage.

I think it's time to let him go. :-( I have some clove oil, and I think that's how we'll do it.

Thanks to all who replied.

C.